« Previous
Next »
Heart, Lung and Circulation
Volume 15, Issue 3
, Pages 161-162
, June 2006
Solutions to Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch in Aortic Valve Replacement
References
- Kestelli M, Ozbek C, Lafci BA, Yilik L, Ozsöyler I, Emrecan B, et al. The multi-planed aortic valve prothesis—subject of editorial.
- . Hemodynamic and physical performance during maximal exercise in patients with an aortic bioprosthetic valve: comparison of stentless versus stented bioprostheses. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:1609–1617
- . Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis–patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:1131–1141
- Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on left ventricular mass regression following aortic valve replacement Ann. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:505–510
- . Patient-prosthesis mismatch can be predicted at the time of operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:265–268
- . Clinical and pathophysiological implications of a bicuspid aortic valve. Circulation. 2002;106:900–904
- Allograft aortic valve replacement: long-term follow up. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60:S65–S70
- . Insights from 36 years’ follow up of a patient with the Ross operation. J Heart Valve Dis. 2003;12:561–565
PII: S1443-9506(06)00069-2
doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2006.03.001
© 2006 Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Heart, Lung and Circulation
Volume 15, Issue 3
, Pages 161-162
, June 2006
