Heart, Lung and Circulation
Volume 16, Issue 2 , Pages 103-106, April 2007

How Best to Manage the Space after Pneumonectomy? Theory and Experience but no Evidence

  • Vasudev Pai, MD

      Affiliations

    • Guy's Hospital, Department of Thoracic Surgery, St. Thomas's Street, SE1 9RT London, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Sameer Gangoli, MBBS

      Affiliations

    • Guy's Hospital, Department of Thoracic Surgery, St. Thomas's Street, SE1 9RT London, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Carol Tan, FRCS

      Affiliations

    • Guy's Hospital, Department of Thoracic Surgery, St. Thomas's Street, SE1 9RT London, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Sheila Rankin, FRCR

      Affiliations

    • Guy's Hospital, Department of Thoracic Surgery, St. Thomas's Street, SE1 9RT London, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Martin Utley, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Operational Research Unit, University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Robert Cameron, FRCS

      Affiliations

    • Guy's Hospital, Department of Thoracic Surgery, St. Thomas's Street, SE1 9RT London, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Loic Lang-Lazdunski, MD

      Affiliations

    • Guy's Hospital, Department of Thoracic Surgery, St. Thomas's Street, SE1 9RT London, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Tom Treasure, FRCS

      Affiliations

    • Guy's Hospital, Department of Thoracic Surgery, St. Thomas's Street, SE1 9RT London, United Kingdom
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 7957 168 754.

Received 9 July 2006; received in revised form 31 October 2006; accepted 4 November 2006.

Objective

We set out to find a policy for the management of the pneumonectomy space which would minimise risk and be acceptable to all the surgeons. We believe this will reduce opportunities for error, be welcomed by nursing staff, and improve adherence to protocols.

Methods

We sought evidence in the scientific and educational literature. Finding no sure guidance, we audited our own experience of two policies, with the emphasis on minimising risk.

Results

There was no evidence from randomised trials. There was no cohesive advice in the text books. Our data indicated that it was improbable that randomised controlled trial (RCT) would have the power to find the evidence. Unable to establish the best strategy, we chose what appeared to be the lowest risk management policy.

Conclusions

It is instructive that such a fundamental question should be unanswered. We have adopted a low risk and well established strategy—an unclamped underwater seal drain—but have no evidence base other than clinical experience. This is illustrative of much of what we do in clinical surgical practice. Avoiding major risk is often more important than proving small differences in benefit.

Keywords: Pneumonectomy, Pleural drains, Evidence

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1443-9506(06)00278-2

doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2006.11.002

Heart, Lung and Circulation
Volume 16, Issue 2 , Pages 103-106, April 2007