Heart, Lung and Circulation
Volume 18, Issue 1 , Pages 32-37, February 2009

Differences in Treatment and Management of Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Patients Presenting with Chest Pain: Results of the Heart Protection Partnership (HPP) Study

  • Isuru Ranasinghe, MBchB

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Hospital Road, Concord, NSW, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding authors. Tel.: +61 2 9767 5000.
  • ,
  • Derek Chew, MPH, FRACP

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, SA, Australia
  • ,
  • Con Aroney, MD, FRACP

      Affiliations

    • Director of Cardiology, Holy Spirit Northside Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  • ,
  • Steven Coverdale, FRACP

      Affiliations

    • Director of Medicine, Nambour General Hospital, Nambour, QLD, Australia
  • ,
  • Roger Allen, FRACP

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  • ,
  • Darren Walters, FRACP

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  • ,
  • David Brieger, PhD, FRACP

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Hospital Road, Concord, NSW, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding authors. Tel.: +61 2 9767 5000.

Received 16 June 2007; received in revised form 21 May 2008; accepted 12 August 2008.

Background

Indigenous patients with acute coronary syndromes represent a high-risk group. There are however few contemporary datasets addressing differences in the presentation and management of Indigenous and non-Indigenous patients with chest pain.

Methods

The Heart Protection Project, is a multicentre retrospective audit of consecutive medical records from patients presenting with chest pain. Patients were identified as Indigenous or non-Indigenous, and time to presentation and cardiac investigations as well as rates of cardiac investigations and procedures were compared between the two groups.

Results

Of the 2380 patients included, 199 (8.4%) identified as Indigenous, and 2174 (91.6%) as non-Indigenous. Indigenous patients were younger, had higher rates hyperlipidaemia, diabetes, smoking, known coronary artery disease and a lower rate of prior PCI; and were significantly less likely to have private health insurance, be admitted to an interventional facility or to have a cardiologist as primary physician. Following adjustment for difference in baseline characteristics, Indigenous patients had comparable rates of cardiac investigations and delay times to presentation and investigations.

Conclusions

Although the Indigenous population was identified as a high-risk group, in this analysis of selected Australian hospitals there were no significant differences in treatment or management of Indigenous patients in comparison to non-Indigenous.

Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome, Health services, Indigenous

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1443-9506(08)00856-1

doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2008.08.014

Heart, Lung and Circulation
Volume 18, Issue 1 , Pages 32-37, February 2009