Heart, Lung and Circulation
Volume 19, Issue 4 , Pages 243-246 , April 2010

Mid-term Results of the Hancock II Valve and Carpentier-Edward Perimount Valve in the Pulmonary Portion in Congenital Heart Disease

  • Jae Gun Kwak, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Sejong General Hospital, Bucheon, Republic of Korea
    • ,
  • Jeong Ryul Lee, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Children's Hospital, 28 Yeongun Dong, Jongno Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +82 11 9989 1081.
    • ,
  • Woong-Han Kim, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Children's Hospital, 28 Yeongun Dong, Jongno Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    • ,
  • Yong Jin Kim, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Children's Hospital, 28 Yeongun Dong, Jongno Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Received 10 March 2009 ,Revised 28 August 2009 ,Accepted 31 October 2009.

References 

  1. de Ruijter FTH, Weenink I, Hitchcock FJ, Meijboom EJ, Bennink GBWE. Right ventricular dysfunction and pulmonary valve replacement after correction of Tetralogy of Fallot. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:1794–1800
  2. Butany J, Leong SW, Cunningham KS, D’Cruz G, Carmichael K, Yau TM. A 10-year comparison of explanted Hancock II and Carpentier-Edwards supraannular bioprostheses. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2007;16:4–13
  3. Borger MA, Franka Nette A, Maganti M, Feindel CM. Carpentier-Edwards Perimount magna valve versus Medtronic Hancock II: a matched hemodynamic comparison. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:2054–2059
  4. BorgerF M.A. , Ivanov J, Armstrong S, Christie-Hrybinsky D, Feindel CM, David TE. Twenty-year results of the Hancock II bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis. 2006;15:49–56
  5. Roselli EE, Smedira NG, Blackstone EH. Failure modes of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in the aortic position. J Heart Valve Dis. 2006;15:421–428
  6. Fiore AC, Rodefeld M, Turrentine M, Vijay P, Reynolds T, Standeven J, et al. Pulmonary valve replacement: a comparison of three biological valves. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:1712–1718
  7. Wright JTM, Eberhardt CE, Gibbs ML, Saul T, Gilpin CB. Hancock II-An improved bioprosthesis, cardiac bioprostheses. In:  Cohn LH,  Gallucci V editor. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium. New York: Yorke Medical Books; 1982;p. 425–444
  8. Bortolotti U, Milano A, Mazzaro E, Thiene G, Talenti E, Casarotto D. Hancock II porcine bioprosthesis: excellent durability at intermediate term follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:676–682
  9. Bortolotti U, Milano A, Mossuto E, Mazzaro E, Thiene G, Casarotto D. Porcine valve durability: a comparison between Hancock Standard and Hancock II bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60:S216–S220
  10. David TE, Armstrong S, Sun Z. Clinical and hemodynamic assessment of the Hancock II bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;54:661–667
  11. Bottio T, Thiene G, Pettenazzo E, Ius P, Bortolotti U, Rizzoli G, et al. Hancock II bioprosthesis: a glance at the microscope in mid-long-term explants. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126:99–105
  12. Schoen FJ, Harasaki H, Kim KM, Anderson HC, Levy RJ. Biomaterial-associated calcification: pathology, mechanisms, and strategies for prevention. J Biomed Mater Res. 1988;22:11–36
  13. Jamieson E. Update on new tissue valves. In:  Franco KL editors. Advanced therapy in cardiac surgery. Hamilton, Ontario: BC Decker; 2003;p. 177–195
  14. Shen M, Kara-Mostefa A, Chen L, Daudon M, Thevenin M, Lacour B, et al. Effect of ethanol and ether in the prevention of calcification of bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:S413–S416
  15. Cunanan CM, Cabiling CM, Dinh TT, Shen SH, Tran-Hata P, Rutledge JH, et al. Tissue characterization and calcification potential of commercial bioprosthetic heart valves. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:S417–S421
  16. Duncan AC, Boughner D, Vesely I. Dynamic glutaraldehyde fixation of a porcine aortic valve xenograft. I. Effect of fixation conditions on the final tissue viscoelastic properties. Biomaterials. 1996;17:1849–1856

PII: S1443-9506(09)01102-0

doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2009.10.009

Heart, Lung and Circulation
Volume 19, Issue 4 , Pages 243-246 , April 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution