Heart, Lung and Circulation
Volume 19, Issue 9 , Pages 541-548, September 2010

One- and Two-dimensional Estimation of Right and Left Ventricular Size and Function—Comparison with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Volumetric Analysis

  • Heinz B. Pfluger, MD

      Affiliations

    • Alfred Hospital Heart Centre and Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Heart Centre, Alfred Hospital, Commercial Road, Melbourne 3004, Victoria, Australia
  • ,
  • Micha T. Maeder, MD

      Affiliations

    • Alfred Hospital Heart Centre and Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Heart Centre, Alfred Hospital, Commercial Road, Melbourne 3004, Victoria, Australia
  • ,
  • Andre LaGerche, MD

      Affiliations

    • St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
  • ,
  • Andrew J. Taylor, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Alfred Hospital Heart Centre and Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Heart Centre, Alfred Hospital, Commercial Road, Melbourne 3004, Victoria, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +61 390763263; fax: +61 390762461.

Received 7 October 2009; received in revised form 23 February 2010; accepted 4 March 2010.

Background

Estimations of right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) size and function based on 1D and 2D measures are commonly used. However, their correlation with volumetric analysis methods is not well documented.

Methods

We analysed a series of subjects undergoing CMR (n=30). Contiguous short axis cine imaging was obtained to assess RV and LV volumes and function. Standard short and long axis cine imaging were performed to evaluate linear and planimetric dimensions as well as functional analysis.

Results

Linear and planimetric measurements of the RV in standard long and short axis views correlated weakly with standard volumetric measurements (r=0.34–0.73). RV ejection fraction (EF), when calculated from single plane functional analysis correlated only moderately with the volumetric EF (r=0.75, p<0.001). In contrast, estimation of LV volumes, mass and EF by biplane area–length method demonstrated excellent correlation with volumetric data (r=0.89, 0.92 and 0.91, p<0.001 for all).

Conclusion

Two-dimensional estimations of volume and function correlate well with LV volumetric analysis, but not with RV volumetric analysis. Estimation of RV size and function based on linear or planimetric assumption models should be performed and interpreted with caution.

Keywords: Cardiac MRI, Ventricular volume, Ventricular function

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1443-9506(10)00087-9

doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2010.03.003

Heart, Lung and Circulation
Volume 19, Issue 9 , Pages 541-548, September 2010