Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with and without Manipulation of the Aorta—A Meta-analysis

J.J.B. Edelman; T.D. Yan; R. Padang; P.G. Bannon; M.P. Vallely

doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2010.11.018

Abstract| Volume 20, ISSUE 4, P256, April 2011

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with and without Manipulation of the Aorta—A Meta-analysis

J.J.B. Edelman
J.J.B. Edelman
Correspondence
Corresponding author.
Affiliations
Cardiothoracic Surgical Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
The Baird Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Faculty of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Search for articles by this author
T.D. Yan
T.D. Yan
Affiliations
Cardiothoracic Surgical Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
The Baird Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Faculty of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Search for articles by this author
R. Padang
R. Padang
Affiliations
Department of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
Search for articles by this author
P.G. Bannon
P.G. Bannon
Affiliations
Cardiothoracic Surgical Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
The Baird Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Faculty of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Search for articles by this author
M.P. Vallely
M.P. Vallely
Affiliations
Cardiothoracic Surgical Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
The Baird Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Faculty of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Search for articles by this author

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2010.11.018

Introduction: The SYNTAX trial showed that coronary artery bypass grafting remains the standard of treatment for left main and three-vessel coronary artery disease, with lower rates of major cardiac and cerebrovascular events and need for revascularisation at 12 months when compared to percutaneous coronary intervention. Surgery did, however, have a higher rate of stroke in the post-operative period (2.2% versus 0.6%) [

[1]

Serruys P.W.
Morice M.-C.
Kappetein A.P.
Colombo A.
Holmes D.R.
Mack M.J.
et al.

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease.

].

To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

Purchase one-time access:

One-time access price info

For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

Subscribe:

Already a print subscriber? Claim online access

Already an online subscriber? Sign in

Register: Create an account

Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

References

- Serruys P.W.
- Morice M.-C.
- Kappetein A.P.
- Colombo A.
- Holmes D.R.
- Mack M.J.
- et al.
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease.
N Engl J Med. 2009; 360: 961-972
View in Article
- Calafiore A.M.
- Di Mauro M.
- Teodori G.
- Di Giammarco G.
- Cirmeni S.
- Contini M.
- et al.
Impact of aortic manipulation on incidence of cerebrovascular accidents after urgical myocardial revascularization.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2002; 73: 1387-1393
View in Article

Article info

Identification

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2010.11.018

Copyright

ScienceDirect

Access this article on ScienceDirect

Property	Value
Status
Version
Ad File
Disable Ads Flag
Environment
Moat Init
Moat Ready
Contextual Ready
Contextual URL
Contextual Initial Segments
Contextual Used Segments
AdUnit
SubAdUnit
Custom Targeting
Ad Events
Invalid Ad Sizes

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with and without Manipulation of the Aorta—A Meta-analysis

Purchase one-time access:

Subscribe:

References

Article info

Identification

Copyright

ScienceDirect

Related Articles