Introduction: The use of the radial artery as a second arterial graft during coronary surgery has
become increasingly popular due to high patency, encouraging clinical outcomes and
low harvest site complication rates in observational and randomised studies. However
it is not clear whether higher risk patients derive such benefits. We sought to assess
this by a comparison of short and mid-term outcomes in higher risk subgroups in an
Australasian database
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Heart, Lung and CirculationAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
Article info
Identification
Copyright
© 2011 Published by Elsevier Inc.
