Warfarin decreases stroke risk in atrial fibrillation patients, with efficacy and safety impacted by the quality of warfarin control, as measured by time in therapeutic range (TTR). Stroke and bleed risk scores are calculated prior to commencing warfarin, so it would be beneficial if these scores also identified likely warfarin control. Some studies have investigated CHADS2, CHA2DS2VASc, and HASBLED individually for this purpose, but application of all scores to diverse ethnic populations and at sites with differing overall control has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to determine if these commonly used risk scores could identify poor warfarin control.
Retrospective data was collected for non-valvular AF patients receiving warfarin between January and June 2014 in Australia and Singapore. Patient data was used to calculate TTR and risk scores. Mean TTR was used for analysis and comparison to categorised scores.
There were 3199 patients in Australia and 1171 in Singapore. At both sites, mean TTR decreased according to HASBLED category, and there was a statistically higher percentage of patients achieving a TTR > 65% in the low HASBLED category. The association between HASBLED scores and TTR was independent of lower dosing in higher risk patients, particularly in Australia. No significant differences were found in mean TTR according to CHADS2 at either site. Time in therapeutic range significantly decreased according to high CHA2DS2VASc category in Singapore, but no differences were found in Australia.
Of the bleed and stroke risk models, HASBLED is most suitable to identify a patient’s potential TTR and ability to achieve TTR > 65%. A high HASBLED score may assist prescribers in determining potential suitability to warfarin, and assist prescribers in deciding on the most suitable anticoagulant for patients.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Heart, Lung and Circulation
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Novel oral anticoagulants and the 73rd anniversary of historical warfarin.J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2016; 28: 31-45
- Quality assessment of anticoagulation dose management: comparative evaluation of measures of time-in-therapeutic range.J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2003; 15: 213-216
- Estimation of the impact of warfarin’s time-in-therapeutic range on stroke and major bleeding rates and its influence on the medical cost avoidance associated with novel oral anticoagulant use-learnings from ARISTOTLE, ROCKET-AF, and RE-LY trials.J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2014; 38: 150-159
- How well do stroke risk scores predict hemorrhage in patients with atrial fibrillation?.Am J Cardiol. 2016; 118: 697-699
- Anticoagulation stability depends on CHADS2 Score and hepatorenal function in warfarin-treated patients, including those with atrial fibrillation.J Atheroscler Thromb. 2017; 24: 68-76
- HAS-BLED predicts warfarin control in Australian patients treated for deep vein thrombosis.Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2017; 120: 299-302
- Impact of baseline stroke risk and bleeding risk on warfarin international normalized ratio control in atrial fibrillation (from the TREAT-AF study).Am J Cardiol. 2017; 119: 268-274
- Evaluation of 5 prognostic scores for prediction of stroke, thromboembolic and coronary events, all-cause mortality, and major adverse cardiac events in patients with atrial fibrillation and coronary stenting.Am J Cardiol. 2016; 118: 700-707
- Patients’ time in therapeutic range on warfarin among US patients with atrial fibrillation: results from ORBIT-AF registry.Am Heart J. 2015; 170 (e1): 141-148
Published online: November 28, 2017
Accepted: November 19, 2017
Received in revised form: October 25, 2017
Received: August 2, 2017
© 2017 Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.