Comparison of Health Related Quality of Life in Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-Analysis

References

1. • Mack M.J.
   • Leon M.B.
   • Smith C.R.
   • Miller D.C.
   • Moses J.W.
   • Tuzcu E.M.
   • et al.
   5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial.
   Lancet. 2015; 385: 2477-2484
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
2. • Brennan J.M.
   • Thomas L.
   • Cohen D.J.
   • Shahian D.
   • Wang A.
   • Mack M.J.
   • et al.
   Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement: propensity-matched comparison.
   J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 70: 439-450
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
3. • Deeb G.M.
   • Reardon M.J.
   • Chetcuti S.
   • Patel H.J.
   • Grossman P.M.
   • Yakubov S.J.
   • et al.
   3-year outcomes in high-risk patients who underwent surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
   J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 67: 2565-2574
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
4. • Reardon M.J.
   • Van Mieghem N.M.
   • Popma J.J.
   • Kleiman N.S.
   • Søndergaard L.
   • Mumtaz M.
   • et al.
   Surgical or transcatheter aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients.
   N Engl J Med. 2017; 376: 1321-1331
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
5. • Arnold S.V.
   • Spertus J.A.
   • Vemulapalli S.
   • Li Z.
   • Matsouaka R.A.
   • Baron S.J.
   • et al.
   Quality-of-life outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in an unselected population: a report from the STS/ACC transcatheter valve therapy registry.
   JAMA Cardiol. 2017; 2: 409-416
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
6. • Tokarek T.
   • Siudak Z.
   • Dziewierz A.
   • Sobczyński R.
   • Zasada W.
   • Sorysz D.
   • et al.
   Assessment of quality of life in patients after surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
   Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 88: E80-E88
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
7. • Lange R.
   • Beckmann A.
   • Neumann T.
   • Krane M.
   • Deutsch M.A.
   • Landwehr S.
   • et al.
   Quality of life after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: prospective data from GARY (German Aortic Valve Registry).
   JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 9: 2541-2554
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
8. • Kappetein A.P.
   • Head S.J.
   • Généreux P.
   • Piazza N.
   • van Mieghem N.M.
   • Blackstone E.H.
   • et al.
   Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document.
   J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60: 1438-1454
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
9. • Green C.P.
   • Porter C.B.
   • Bresnahan D.R.
   • Spertus J.A.
   Development and evaluation of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire: a new health status measure for heart failure.
   J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35: 1245-1255
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
10. • Arnold S.V.
    • Spertus J.A.
    • Lei Y.
    • Allen K.B.
    • Chhatriwalla A.K.
    • Leon M.B.
    • et al.
    Use of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire for monitoring health status in patients with aortic stenosis.
    Circ Heart Fail. 2013; 6: 61-67
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
11. • Ware Jr, J.E.
    • Sherbourne C.D.
    The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.
    Med Care. 1992; 30: 473-483
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
12. • Ware Jr, J.
    • Kosinski M.
    • Keller S.D.
    A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity.
    Med Care. 1996; 34: 220-233
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
13. • Failde I.
    • Ramos I.
    Validity and reliability of the SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire in patients with coronary artery disease.
    J Clin Epidemiol. 2000; 53: 359-365
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
14. • Failde I.
    • Medina P.
    • Ramirez C.
    • Arana R.
    Construct and criterion validity of the SF-12 health questionnaire in patients with acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina.
    J Eval Clin Pract. 2010; 16: 569-573
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
15. • Shaw J.W.
    • Johnson J.A.
    • Coons S.J.
    US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model.
    Med Care. 2005; 43: 203-220
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
16. • Reynolds M.R.
    • Magnuson E.A.
    • Wang K.
    • Thourani V.H.
    • Williams M.
    • Zajarias A.
    • et al.
    Health-related quality of life after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: results from the PARTNER (Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve) Trial (Cohort A).
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60: 548-558
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
17. • Arnold S.V.
    • Reynolds M.R.
    • Wang K.
    • Magnuson E.A.
    • Baron S.J.
    • Chinnakondepalli K.M.
    • et al.
    Health status after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis at increased surgical risk: results from the CoreValve US pivotal trial.
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 8: 1207-1217
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
18. • Gada H.
    • Kirtane A.J.
    • Wang K.
    • Lei Y.
    • Magnuson E.
    • Reynolds M.R.
    • et al.
    Temporal trends in quality of life outcomes after transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER valve (PARTNER) trial substudy.
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015; 8: 338-346
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
19. • Baron S.J.
    • Arnold S.V.
    • Wang K.
    • Magnuson E.A.
    • Chinnakondepali K.
    • Makkar R.
    • et al.
    Health status benefits of transcatheter vs surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis at intermediate surgical risk: results from the PARTNER randomized clinical trial.
    JAMA Cardiol. 2017; 2: 837-845
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
20. • Smith C.R.
    • Leon M.B.
    • Mack M.J.
    • Miller D.C.
    • Moses J.W.
    • Svensson L.G.
    • et al.
    Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients.
    N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 2187-2198
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
21. • Leon M.B.
    • Smith C.R.
    • Mack M.J.
    • Makkar R.R.
    • Svensson L.G.
    • Kodali S.K.
    • et al.
    Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients.
    N Engl J Med. 2016; 374: 1609-1620
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
22. • Soto G.E.
    • Jones P.
    • Weintraub W.S.
    • Krumholz H.M.
    • Spertus J.A.
    Prognostic value of health status in patients with heart failure after acute myocardial infarction.
    Circulation. 2004; 110: 546-551
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
23. • Chan P.S.
    • Soto G.
    • Jones P.G.
    • Nallamothu B.K.
    • Zhang Z.
    • Weintraub W.S.
    • et al.
    Patient health status and costs in heart failure: insights from the eplerenone post-acute myocardial infarction heart failure efficacy and survival study (EPHESUS).
    Circulation. 2009; 119: 398-407
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
24. • Grover F.L.
    • Vemulapalli S.
    • Carroll J.D.
    • Edwards F.H.
    • Mack M.J.
    • Thourani V.H.
    • et al.
    2016 Annual Report of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry.
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 69: 1215-1230
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar