Advertisement
Heart, Lung and Circulation

The Footprints of Electrocardiographic Interference: Fact or Artefact

Published:April 08, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2019.03.006
      Corporeal and particularly extra-corporeal interference is a very common problem encountered with both resting electrocardiograph (ECG) tracings and ambulatory recordings. The interference may be either electrical or mechanical and if severe, may affect the interpretation of the tracings. The interference, seen as artefact, can be divided into obvious, subtle or complicated. Obvious artefact may result from poor electrode attachment or body motion, whereas electrical interference is predominantly 50 or 60 Hz alternating current or radiofrequency waves from power lines, electrical equipment, mobile phones, fluorescent lights and electrical diathermy. Careful attention to the application of electrodes and finding the best environment for performing a 12-lead ECG will eradicate most interference. When subtle, the artefact can mimic cardiac arrhythmias, leading to incorrect interpretation of the tracings. There is also a complicated interference group, usually due to implanted cardiac electronic pacing devices and neurostimulators. These create persistent artefact, which may result in repeated unsuccessful attempts at procuring an artefact free tracing. This manuscript will describe the genesis of interference, how an ECG machine or monitor deals with interference and will discuss the common causes of interference. The characteristic patterns will be described and clues provided on how to differentiate subtle artefact from cardiac arrhythmias.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Heart, Lung and Circulation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Mond H.G.
        • Garcia J.
        • Visagathilagar T.
        Twisted leads: the footprints of malpositioned electrocardiographic leads.
        Heart Lung Circ. 2016; 25: 61-67
        • Buendia-Fuentes F.
        • Arnau-Vives M.A.
        • Arnau-Vives A.
        • Jimenez-Jimenez Y.
        • Rueda-Soriano J.
        • Zorio-Grima E.
        • et al.
        High-bandpass filters in electrocardiography: source of error in the interpretation of the ST segment.
        ISRN Cardiol. 2012; 706217
        • Bailey J.J.
        • Berson A.S.
        • Garson Jr., A.
        • Horan L.G.
        • MacFarlane P.W.
        • Mortara D.W.
        • et al.
        Recommendations for standardization and specifications in automated electrocardiography: bandwidth and digital signal processing.
        Circulation. 1990; 81: 730-739
        • Lee J.-W.
        • Lee G.-K.
        Design of an adaptive filter with a dynamic structure for ECG signal processing.
        Int J Control Autom Syst. 2005; 3: 137-142
        • Imtiaz S.A.
        • Mardell J.
        • Saremi-Yarahmadi S.
        • Rogriques-Villegas E.
        ECG artefact identification and removal in mHealth systems for continuous patient monitoring.
        Healthc Technol Lett. 2016; 3: 171-176
        • Mond H.G.
        The spectrum of ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring.
        Heart Lung Circ. 2017; 26: 1160-1174
        • Mond H.G.
        • Vohra J.
        The electrocardiographic footprints of Wenckebach block.
        Heart Lung Circ. 2017; 26: 1252-1266
        • Matthias A.T.
        • Indrakumar J.
        Electrocardiogram artefact caused by rigors mimicking narrow complex tachycardia: a case report.
        BMC Res Notes. 2014; 7: 80
        • Huang C.Y.
        • Shan D.-E.
        • Lai C.-H.
        • Fong M.-C.
        • Huang P.-S.
        • Huang H.-H.
        • et al.
        An accurate electrocardiographic algorithm for differentiation of tremor-induced pseudo-ventricular tachycardia and true ventricular tachycardia.
        Int J Cardiol. 2006; 111: 163-165
        • Sevenson W.G.
        • Maisel W.H.
        Electrocardiography artefact: what you do not know, you do not recognise.
        Am J Med. 2001; 110: 402-403
        • Knight B.P.
        • Pelosi F.
        • Michaud G.F.
        • Strickberger S.A.
        • Morady F.
        Clinical consequences of electrocardiographic artefact mimicking ventricular tachycardia.
        N Engl J Med. 1999; 341: 1270-1274
        • Knight B.P.
        • Pelosi F.
        • Michaud G.F.
        • Strickberger S.A.
        • Morady F.
        Physician interpretation of electrocardiographic artefact that mimics ventricular tachycardia.
        Am J Med. 2001; 110: 335-338
        • Massel D.
        • Dawdy J.A.
        • Melendez L.J.
        Strict reliance on a computer algorithm for measurable ST segment criteria may lead to errors in thrombolytic therapy eligibility.
        Am Heart J. 2000; 140: 221-226
        • Rudiger A.
        • Schob L.
        • Follath F.
        Influence of electrode misplacement on the electrocardiographic signs of inferior myocardial ischaemia.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2003; 21: 574-577
        • Aslager E.
        • Yalin K.
        Electromechanical association: a subtle electrocardiogram artifact.
        J Electrocardiol. 2012; 45: 15-17
        • Mond H.G.
        • Freitag G.
        The cardiac implantable electronic device power source: evolution and revolution.
        Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014; 37: 1728-1745
        • Ortega D.F.
        • Sammartino M.V.
        • Pellegrino G.M.M.
        • Barja L.D.
        • Albina G.
        • Segura E.V.
        • et al.
        Runaway pacemaker: a forgotten phenomenon?.
        Europace. 2005; 7: 592-597
        • Mond H.
        • Strathmore N.
        • Kertes P.
        • Hunt D.
        • Baker G.
        Rate responsive pacing using a minute ventilation sensor.
        Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1988; 11: 1866-1874
      1. Biotronik products. Closed loop stimulation. https://www.biotronik.com/en-us/products/services/cls.