Advertisement
Heart, Lung and Circulation

Assessment of Coronary Artery Obstruction Risk During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Utilising 3D-Printing

Published:March 29, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2022.01.007

      Background

      Current imaging techniques may inadequately rule out coronary artery obstruction (CAO), a potentially fatal complication during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Advancements in three-dimensional (3D)-printing allow the development of models capable of replicating cardiac anatomy and predicting CAO. We sought to simulate TAVR utilising 3D-printed cardiac models to improve CAO risk assessment and procedural safety.

      Methods

      Thirteen (13) patients with aortic stenosis at high-risk of CAO during TAVR were selected for 3D-printed modelling. The relevant anatomy for TAVR was precisely reconstructed with Materialise Heart Print-Flex (Materialse, Leuven, Belgium) technology. An appropriately sized valve prosthesis was deployed in each 3D-model and coronary ostia assessed for obstruction.

      Results

      Model-derived results were compared to clinical outcomes in 13 cases. One high-risk case underwent TAVR resulting in left main obstruction and subsequent stenting. This outcome was accurately predicted by the 3D-model simulation. Two (2) high-risk TAVR cases were abandoned following transient CAO during balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV). The 3D-model simulations correlated with these findings, demonstrating CAO either by a calcium nodule or the native valve leaflet. In another two cases, BAV was uncertain, however the 3D-simulation demonstrated patency and successful TAVR was undertaken. In remaining cases, no obstruction was demonstrated in-vitro, and all underwent uncomplicated TAVR.

      Conclusions

      In this proof-of-concept study, 3D-model TAVR simulation correlates well to clinical outcomes. 3D-models of patients at high-risk of CAO may be utilised in pre-procedural planning to accurately predict this complication. As lower-risk surgical cohorts are considered for TAVR, 3D-models may minimise complications leading to safer patient outcomes.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Heart, Lung and Circulation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Leon M.B.
        • Smith C.R.
        • Mack M.
        • Millder D.C.
        • Moses J.W.
        • Svensson L.G.
        • et al.
        Transcatheter aortic-valve Implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery.
        N Engl J Med. 2010; 363: 1597-1607
        • Kapadia S.R.
        • Leon M.B.
        • Makkar R.R.
        • Tuzcu E.M.
        • Svensson L.G.
        • Kodali S.
        • et al.
        5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with standard treatment for patients with inoperable aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial.
        Lancet. 2015; 385: 2485-2491
        • Siontis G.C.
        • Praz F.
        • Pilgrim T.
        • Mavridis D.
        • Verma S.
        • Salanti G.
        • et al.
        Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of severe aortic stenosis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
        Eur Heart J. 2016; 37: 3503-3512
        • Mack M.J.
        • Leon M.B.
        • Thourani V.H.
        • Makkar R.
        • Kodali S.K.
        • Russo M.
        • et al.
        Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a balloon-expandable valve in low-risk patients.
        N Engl J Med. 2019; 380: 1695-1705
        • Masson J.B.
        • Kovac J.
        • Schuler G.
        • Ye J.
        • Cheung A.
        • Kapadia S.
        • et al.
        Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: review of the nature, management, and avoidance of procedural complications.
        J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovasc Interv. 2009; 2: 811-820
        • Ribeiro H.B.
        • Webb J.G.
        • Makkar R.R.
        • Cohen M.G.
        • Kapadia S.R.
        • Kodali S.
        • et al.
        Predictive factors, management, and clinical outcomes of coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: insights from a large multicenter registry.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 62: 1552-1562
        • Ribeiro H.B.
        • Nombela-Franco L.
        • Urena M.
        • Mok M.
        • Pasian S.
        • Doyle D.
        • et al.
        Coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review.
        J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovasc Interv. 2013; 6: 452-461
        • Arai T.
        • Lefèvre T.
        • Hovasse T.
        • Garot P.
        • Benamer H.
        • Unterseeh T.
        • et al.
        Incidence and predictors of coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the real world.
        Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 90: 1192-1197
        • Rivard A.L.
        • Bartel T.
        • Bianco R.W.
        • O'Donnell K.S.
        • Bonatti J.
        • Dichtl W.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of aortic root and valve calcifications by multi-detector computed tomography.
        J Heart Valve Dis. 2009; 18: 662-670
        • Tops L.F.
        • Wood D.A.
        • Delgado V.
        • Schuijf J.D.
        • Mayo J.R.
        • Pasupati S.
        • et al.
        Noninvasive evaluation of the aortic root with multislice computed tomography: implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
        JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008; 1: 321-330
        • Vukicevic M.
        • Mosadegh B.
        • Min J.K.
        • Little S.H.
        Cardiac 3D printing and its future directions.
        JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017; 10: 171-184
        • Cai T.
        • Cheezum M.K.
        • Giannopoulos A.A.
        • Blankstein R.
        • Rybicki F.J.
        • Steigner M.L.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of 3D printed models of the aortic valve complex for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) planning: comparison to computed tomographic angiography (CTA).
        Circulation. 2015; 132: A14658
        • Maragiannis D.
        • Jackson M.S.
        • Igo S.R.
        • Schutt R.C.
        • Connell P.
        • Grande-Allen J.
        • et al.
        Replicating patient-specific severe aortic valve stenosis with functional 3D modeling.
        Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 8e003626
        • Gomez-Ciriza G.
        • Hussain T.
        • Gomez-Cia T.
        • Valverde I.
        Potential of 3D-printed models in planning structural interventional procedures.
        Interv Cardiol. 2015; 7: 343-350
        • Farooqi K.M.
        • Gonzalez-Lengua C.
        • Shenoy R.
        • Sanz J.
        • Nguyen K.
        Use of a three dimensional printed cardiac model to assess suitability for biventricular repair.
        World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2016; 7: 414-416
        • Lau I.
        • Sun Z.
        Three-dimensional printing in congenital heart disease: a systematic review.
        J Med Radiat Sci. 2018; 65: 226-236
        • Lee S.
        • Squelch A.
        • Sun Z.
        Quantitative assessment of 3D printed model accuracy in delineating congenital heart disease.
        Biomolecules. 2021; 11: 270
        • Votta E.
        • Trung Bao L.
        • Stevanella M.
        • Fusini L.
        • Caiani E.G.
        • Redaelli A.
        • et al.
        Toward patient-specific simulations of cardiac valves: state-of-the-art and future directions.
        J Biomech. 2013; 46: 217-228
        • Bosi G.M.
        • Capelli C.
        • Cheang M.H.
        • Delahunty N.
        • Mullen M.
        • Taylor A.M.
        • et al.
        A validated computational frameowrk to predict outcomes in TAVI.
        Sci Rep. 2020; 10: 9906