Contemporary Chest Pain Evaluation: The Australian Case for Cardiac CT

References

1. • Hsia R.Y.
   • Hale Z.
   • Tabas J.A.
   A national study of the prevalence of life-threatening diagnoses in patients with chest pain.
   JAMA Intern Med. 2016; 176: 1029-1032
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
2. • Khan M.A.
   • Hashim M.J.
   • Mustafa H.
   • Baniyas M.Y.
   • Al Suwaidi S.
   • AlKatheeri R.
   • et al.
   Global epidemiology of ischemic heart disease: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study.
   Cureus. 2020; 12: e9349
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
3. • Wright R.S.
   • Anderson J.L.
   • Adams C.D.
   • Bridges C.R.
   • Casey Jr., D.E.
   • Ettinger S.M.
   • et al.
   2011 ACCF/AHA focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines developed in collaboration with the American Academy of Family Physicians, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
   J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 57: e215-e367
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
4. • Moss A.J.
   • Williams M.C.
   • Newby D.E.
   • Nicol E.D.
   The updated NICE guidelines: cardiac CT as the first-line test for coronary artery disease.
   Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep. 2017; 10: 15
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
5. • Knuuti J.
   • Wijns W.
   • Saraste A.
   • Capodanno D.
   • Barbato E.
   • Funck-Brentano C.
   • et al.
   2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes.
   Eur Heart J. 2020; 41: 407-477
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
6. • Gulati M.
   • Levy P.D.
   • Mukherjee D.
   • Amsterdam E.
   • Bhatt D.L.
   • Birtcher K.K.
   • et al.
   2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.
   Circulation. 2021; Cir0000000000001030
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
7. • Patel M.R.
   • Peterson E.D.
   • Dai D.
   • Brennan J.M.
   • Redberg R.F.
   • Anderson H.V.
   • et al.
   Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography.
   N Engl J Med. 2010; 362: 886-895
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
8. • Genders T.S.
   • Petersen S.E.
   • Pugliese F.
   • Dastidar A.G.
   • Fleischmann K.E.
   • Nieman K.
   • et al.
   The optimal imaging strategy for patients with stable chest pain: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
   Ann Intern Med. 2015; 162: 474-484
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
9. • Abdelrahman K.M.
   • Chen M.Y.
   • Dey A.K.
   • Virmani R.
   • Finn A.V.
   • Khamis R.Y.
   • et al.
   Coronary computed tomography angiography from clinical uses to emerging technologies: JACC state-of-the-art review.
   J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 76: 1226-1243
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
10. • Jennings G.L.
    • Audehm R.
    • Bishop W.
    • Chow C.K.
    • Liaw S.T.
    • Liew D.
    • et al.
    National Heart Foundation of Australia: position statement on coronary artery calcium scoring for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in Australia.
    Med J Aust. 2021; 214: 434-439
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
11. • Mortensen M.B.
    • Gaur S.
    • Frimmer A.
    • Bøtker H.E.
    • Sørensen H.T.
    • Kragholm K.H.
    • et al.
    Association of age with the diagnostic value of coronary artery calcium score for ruling out coronary stenosis in symptomatic patients.
    JAMA Cardiol. 2022; 7: 36-44
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
12. • Mowatt G.
    • Cook J.A.
    • Hillis G.S.
    • Walker S.
    • Fraser C.
    • Jia X.
    • et al.
    64-Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Heart. 2008; 94: 1386-1393
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
13. • von Ballmoos M.W.
    • Haring B.
    • Juillerat P.
    • Alkadhi H.
    Meta-analysis: diagnostic performance of low-radiation-dose coronary computed tomography angiography.
    Ann Intern Med. 2011; 154: 413-420
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
14. • Hulten E.A.
    • Carbonaro S.
    • Petrillo S.P.
    • Mitchell J.D.
    • Villines T.C.
    Prognostic value of cardiac computed tomography angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 57: 1237-1247
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
15. • Andreini D.
    • Pontone G.
    • Mushtaq S.
    • Bartorelli A.L.
    • Bertella E.
    • Antonioli L.
    • et al.
    A long-term prognostic value of coronary CT angiography in suspected coronary artery disease.
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012; 5: 690-701
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
16. • Budoff M.J.
    • Dowe D.
    • Jollis J.G.
    • Gitter M.
    • Sutherland J.
    • Halamert E.
    • et al.
    Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial.
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52: 1724-1732
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
17. • Gentile F.
    • Castiglione V.
    • De Caterina R.
    Coronary artery anomalies.
    Circulation. 2021; 144: 983-996
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
18. • Douglas P.S.
    • Hoffmann U.
    • Patel M.R.
    • Mark D.B.
    • Al-Khalidi H.R.
    • Cavanaugh B.
    • et al.
    Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease.
    N Engl J Med. 2015; 372: 1291-1300
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
19. • Gongora C.A.
    • Bavishi C.
    • Uretsky S.
    • Argulian E.
    Acute chest pain evaluation using coronary computed tomography angiography compared with standard of care: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.
    Heart. 2018; 104: 215-221
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
20. • Siontis G.C.
    • Mavridis D.
    • Greenwood J.P.
    • Coles B.
    • Nikolakopoulou A.
    • Jüni P.
    • et al.
    Outcomes of non-invasive diagnostic modalities for the detection of coronary artery disease: network meta-analysis of diagnostic randomised controlled trials.
    BMJ. 2018; 360: k504
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
21. • Williams M.C.
    • Hunter A.
    • Shah A.S.V.
    • Assi V.
    • Lewis S.
    • Smith J.
    • et al.
    Use of coronary computed tomographic angiography to guide management of patients with coronary disease.
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 67: 1759-1768
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
22. • Nielsen L.H.
    • Ortner N.
    • Nørgaard B.L.
    • Achenbach S.
    • Leipsic J.
    • Abdulla J.
    The diagnostic accuracy and outcomes after coronary computed tomography angiography vs. conventional functional testing in patients with stable angina pectoris: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014; 15: 961-971
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
23. • Arbab-Zadeh A.
    • Di Carli M.F.
    • Cerci R.
    • George R.T.
    • Chen M.Y.
    • Dewey M.
    • et al.
    Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography and single-photon emission computed tomography-acquired myocardial perfusion imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 8e003533
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
24. • Patel M.R.
    • Dai D.
    • Hernandez A.F.
    • Douglas P.S.
    • Messenger J.
    • Garratt K.N.
    • et al.
    Prevalence and predictors of nonobstructive coronary artery disease identified with coronary angiography in contemporary clinical practice.
    Am Heart J. 2014; 167: 846-852.e2
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
25. • Masi S.
    • Rizzoni D.
    • Taddei S.
    • Widmer R.J.
    • Montezano A.C.
    • Lüscher T.F.
    • et al.
    Assessment and pathophysiology of microvascular disease: recent progress and clinical implications.
    Eur Heart J. 2021; 42: 2590-2604
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
26. • Jones E.
    • Eteiba W.
    • Merz N.B.
    Cardiac syndrome X and microvascular coronary dysfunction.
    Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2012; 22: 161-168
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
27. • Tonino P.A.
    • De Bruyne B.
    • Pijls N.H.
    • Siebert U.
    • Ikeno F.
    • van' t Veer M.
    • et al.
    Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention.
    N Engl J Med. 2009; 360: 213-224
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
28. • Danad I.
    • Szymonifka J.
    • Twisk J.W.R.
    • Norgaard B.L.
    • Zarins C.K.
    • Knaapen P.
    • et al.
    Diagnostic performance of cardiac imaging methods to diagnose ischaemia-causing coronary artery disease when directly compared with fractional flow reserve as a reference standard: a meta-analysis.
    Eur Heart J. 2017; 38: 991-998
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
29. • Danad I.
    • Raijmakers P.G.
    • Driessen R.S.
    • Leipsic J.
    • Raju R.
    • Naoum C.
    • et al.
    Comparison of coronary CT angiography, SPECT, PET, and hybrid imaging for diagnosis of ischemic heart disease determined by fractional flow reserve.
    JAMA Cardiol. 2017; 2: 1100-1107
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
30. • Bangalore S.
    • Maron D.J.
    • Stone G.W.
    • Hochman J.S.
    Routine revascularization versus initial medical therapy for stable ischemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Circulation. 2020; 142: 841-857
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
31. • Morgan-Hughes G.
    • Williams M.C.
    • Loudon M.
    • Roobottom C.A.
    • Veitch A.
    • Van Lingen R.
    • et al.
    Downstream testing after CT coronary angiography: time for a rethink?.
    Open Heart. 2021; 8
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
32. • Foldyna B.
    • Udelson J.E.
    • Karády J.
    • Banerji D.
    • Lu M.T.
    • Mayrhofer T.
    • et al.
    Pretest probability for patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease: re-evaluating Diamond-Forrester for the contemporary era and clinical implications: insights from the PROMISE trial.
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 20: 574-581
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
33. • Maddox T.M.
    • Stanislawski M.A.
    • Grunwald G.K.
    • Bradley S.M.
    • Ho P.M.
    • Tsai T.T.
    • et al.
    Nonobstructive coronary artery disease and risk of myocardial infarction.
    JAMA. 2014; 312: 1754-1763
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
34. • Hadamitzky M.
    • Achenbach S.
    • Al-Mallah M.
    • Berman D.
    • Budoff M.
    • Cademartiri F.
    • et al.
    Optimized prognostic score for coronary computed tomographic angiography: results from the CONFIRM registry (COronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN For Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational Multicenter Registry).
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 62: 468-476
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
35. • Mortensen M.B.
    • Dzaye O.
    • Steffensen F.H.
    • Bøtker H.E.
    • Jensen J.M.
    • Rønnow Sand N.P.
    • et al.
    Impact of plaque burden versus stenosis on ischemic events in patients with coronary atherosclerosis.
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 76: 2803-2813
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
36. • Hoffmann U.
    • Ferencik M.
    • Udelson J.E.
    • Picard M.H.
    • Truong Q.A.
    • Patel M.R.
    • et al.
    Prognostic value of noninvasive cardiovascular testing in patients with stable chest pain: insights from the PROMISE trial (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain).
    Circulation. 2017; 135: 2320-2332
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
37. • Neglia D.
    • Rovai D.
    • Caselli C.
    • Pietila M.
    • Teresinska A.
    • Aguadé-Bruix S.
    • et al.
    Detection of significant coronary artery disease by noninvasive anatomical and functional imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 2015;8
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
38. • Boden W.E.
    • O'Rourke R.A.
    • Teo K.K.
    • Hartigan P.M.
    • Maron D.J.
    • Kostuk W.J.
    • et al.
    Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease.
    N Engl J Med. 2007; 356: 1503-1516
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
39. • Frye R.L.
    • August P.
    • Brooks M.M.
    • Hardison R.M.
    • Kelsey S.F.
    • MacGregor J.M.
    • et al.
    A randomized trial of therapies for type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease.
    N Engl J Med. 2009; 360: 2503-2515
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
40. • Stergiopoulos K.
    • Boden W.E.
    • Hartigan P.
    • Möbius-Winkler S.
    • Hambrecht R.
    • Hueb W.
    • et al.
    Percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes in patients with stable obstructive coronary artery disease and myocardial ischemia: a collaborative meta-analysis of contemporary randomized clinical trials.
    JAMA Intern Med. 2014; 174: 232-240
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
41. • Budoff M.J.
    What does the PROMISE trial mean for cardiac CT? Outcome of coronary CT angiography vs functional testing in suspected coronary artery disease.
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015; 9: 250-251
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
42. • Newby D.E.
    • Adamson P.D.
    • Berry C.
    • Boon N.A.
    • Dweck M.R.
    • Flather M.
    • et al.
    Coronary CT angiography and 5-year risk of myocardial infarction.
    N Engl J Med. 2018; 379: 924-933
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
43. • Mangion K.
    • Adamson P.D.
    • Williams M.C.
    • Hunter A.
    • Pawade T.
    • Shah A.S.V.
    • et al.
    Sex associations and computed tomography coronary angiography-guided management in patients with stable chest pain.
    Eur Heart J. 2020; 41: 1337-1345
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
44. • Maron D.J.
    • Hochman J.S.
    • Reynolds H.R.
    • Bangalore S.
    • O'Brien S.M.
    • Boden W.E.
    • et al.
    Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease.
    N Engl J Med. 2020; 382: 1395-1407
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
45. • Hanson C.A.
    • Patel T.R.
    • Villines T.C.
    The new role of cardiac imaging following the ISCHEMIA trial.
    Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2021; 23
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
46. • Celeng C.
    • Leiner T.
    • Maurovich-Horvat P.
    • Merkely B.
    • de Jong P.
    • Dankbaar J.W.
    • et al.
    Anatomical and functional computed tomography for diagnosing hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 12: 1316-1325
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
47. • Driessen R.S.
    • Danad I.
    • Stuijfzand W.J.
    • Raijmakers P.G.
    • Schumacher S.P.
    • van Diemen P.A.
    • et al.
    Comparison of coronary computed tomography angiography, fractional flow reserve, and perfusion imaging for ischemia diagnosis.
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 73: 161-173
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
48. • Lu M.T.
    • Ferencik M.
    • Roberts R.S.
    • Lee K.L.
    • Ivanov A.
    • Adami E.
    • et al.
    Noninvasive FFR derived from coronary CT angiography: management and outcomes in the PROMISE trial.
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017; 10: 1350-1358
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
49. • Nørgaard B.L.
    • Terkelsen C.J.
    • Mathiassen O.N.
    • Grove E.L.
    • Bøtker H.E.
    • Parner E.
    • et al.
    Coronary CT angiographic and flow reserve-guided management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease.
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 72: 2123-2134
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
50. • Ihdayhid A.R.
    • Norgaard B.L.
    • Gaur S.
    • Leipsic J.
    • Nerlekar N.
    • Osawa K.
    • et al.
    Prognostic value and risk continuum of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography.
    Radiology. 2019; 292: 343-351
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
51. • Modi B.N.
    • Sankaran S.
    • Kim H.J.
    • Ellis H.
    • Rogers C.
    • Taylor C.A.
    • et al.
    Predicting the physiological effect of revascularization in serially diseased coronary arteries.
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 12e007577
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
52. • Motoyama S.
    • Ito H.
    • Sarai M.
    • Kondo T.
    • Kawai H.
    • Nagahara Y.
    • et al.
    Plaque characterization by coronary computed tomography angiography and the likelihood of acute coronary events in mid-term follow-up.
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 66: 337-346
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
53. • Williams M.C.
    • Moss A.J.
    • Dweck M.
    • Adamson P.D.
    • Alam S.
    • Hunter A.
    • et al.
    Coronary artery plaque characteristics associated with adverse outcomes in the SCOT-HEART study.
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 73: 291-301
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
54. • Williams M.C.
    • Kwiecinski J.
    • Doris M.
    • McElhinney P.
    • D'Souza M.S.
    • Cadet S.
    • et al.
    Low-attenuation noncalcified plaque on coronary computed tomography angiography predicts myocardial infarction: results from the multicenter SCOT-HEART trial (Scottish Computed Tomography of the HEART).
    Circulation. 2020; 141: 1452-1462
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
55. • Ferencik M.
    • Mayrhofer T.
    • Bittner D.O.
    • Emami H.
    • Puchner S.B.
    • Lu M.T.
    • et al.
    Use of high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaque detection for risk stratification of patients with stable chest pain: a secondary analysis of the PROMISE randomized clinical trial.
    JAMA Cardiol. 2018; 3: 144-152
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
56. • Oikonomou E.K.
    • Marwan M.
    • Desai M.Y.
    • Mancio J.
    • Alashi A.
    • Hutt Centeno E.
    • et al.
    Non-invasive detection of coronary inflammation using computed tomography and prediction of residual cardiovascular risk (the CRISP CT study): a post-hoc analysis of prospective outcome data.
    Lancet. 2018; 392: 929-939
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
57. • Antonopoulos A.S.
    • Sanna F.
    • Sabharwal N.
    • Thomas S.
    • Oikonomou E.K.
    • Herdman L.
    • et al.
    Detecting human coronary inflammation by imaging perivascular fat.
    Sci Transl Med. 2017; 9
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
58. • Dey D.
    • Slomka P.J.
    • Leeson P.
    • Comaniciu D.
    • Shrestha S.
    • Sengupta P.P.
    • et al.
    Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular imaging: JACC state-of-the-art review.
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 73: 1317-1335
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
59. • van den Oever L.B.
    • Vonder M.
    • van Assen M.
    • van Ooijen P.M.A.
    • de Bock G.H.
    • Xie X.Q.
    • et al.
    Application of artificial intelligence in cardiac CT: from basics to clinical practice.
    Eur J Radiol. 2020; 128108969
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
60. • Si-Mohamed S.A.
    • Sigovan M.
    • Hsu J.C.
    • Tatard-Leitman V.
    • Chalabreysse L.
    • Naha P.C.
    • et al.
    In vivo molecular K-edge imaging of atherosclerotic plaque using photon-counting CT.
    Radiology. 2021; 300: 98-107
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
61. • Abbara S.
    • Blanke P.
    • Maroules C.D.
    • Cheezum M.
    • Choi A.D.
    • Han B.K.
    • et al.
    SCCT guidelines for the performance and acquisition of coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee: endorsed by the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI).
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016; 10: 435-449
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
62. • Achenbach S.
    • Marwan M.
    • Ropers D.
    • Schepis T.
    • Pflederer T.
    • Anders K.
    • et al.
    Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition.
    Eur Heart J. 2010; 31: 340-346
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
63. • Meijboom W.B.
    • Meijs M.F.
    • Schuijf J.D.
    • Cramer M.J.
    • Mollet N.R.
    • van Mieghem C.A.
    • et al.
    Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study.
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52: 2135-2144
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
64. • Dai T.
    • Wang J.R.
    • Hu P.F.
    Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography in the detection of coronary artery in-stent restenosis: evidence from an updated meta-analysis.
    Eur Radiol. 2018; 28: 1373-1382
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
65. • Cheng V.Y.
    • Berman D.S.
    • Rozanski A.
    • Dunning A.M.
    • Achenbach S.
    • Al-Mallah M.
    • et al.
    Performance of the traditional age, sex, and angina typicality-based approach for estimating pretest probability of angiographically significant coronary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary computed tomographic angiography: results from the multinational coronary CT angiography evaluation for clinical outcomes: an international multicenter registry (CONFIRM).
    Circulation. 2011; 124 (2423-32, 1-8)
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
66. • Ferreira A.M.
    • Marques H.
    • Tralhão A.
    • Santos M.B.
    • Santos A.R.
    • Cardoso G.
    • et al.
    Pre-test probability of obstructive coronary stenosis in patients undergoing coronary CT angiography: comparative performance of the modified diamond-Forrester algorithm versus methods incorporating cardiovascular risk factors.
    Int J Cardiol. 2016; 222: 346-351
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
67. • Feger S.
    • Ibes P.
    • Napp A.E.
    • Lembcke A.
    • Laule M.
    • Dreger H.
    • et al.
    Clinical pre-test probability for obstructive coronary artery disease: insights from the European DISCHARGE pilot study.
    Eur Radiol. 2021; 31: 1471-1481
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
68. • Winther S.
    • Schmidt S.E.
    • Rasmussen L.D.
    • Juárez Orozco L.E.
    • Steffensen F.H.
    • Bøtker H.E.
    • et al.
    Validation of the European Society of Cardiology pre-test probability model for obstructive coronary artery disease.
    Eur Heart J. 2021; 42: 1401-1411
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
69. • Lee A.J.
    • Michail M.
    • Quaderi S.A.
    • Richardson J.A.
    • Aggarwal S.K.
    • Speechly-Dick M.E.
    Implementation of NICE Clinical Guideline 95 for assessment of stable chest pain in a rapid access chest pain clinic reduces the mean number of investigations and cost per patient.
    Open Heart. 2015; 2e000151
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
70. • Goldstein J.A.
    • Chinnaiyan K.M.
    • Abidov A.
    • Achenbach S.
    • Berman D.S.
    • Hayes S.W.
    • et al.
    The CT-STAT (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Systematic Triage of Acute Chest Pain Patients to Treatment) trial.
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58: 1414-1422
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
71. • Hulten E.
    • Pickett C.
    • Bittencourt M.S.
    • Villines T.C.
    • Petrillo S.
    • Di Carli M.F.
    • et al.
    Outcomes after coronary computed tomography angiography in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.
    J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61: 880-892
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
72. • Hoffmann U.
    • Truong Q.A.
    • Schoenfeld D.A.
    • Chou E.T.
    • Woodard P.K.
    • Nagurney J.T.
    • et al.
    Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain.
    N Engl J Med. 2012; 367: 299-308
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
73. • Litt H.I.
    • Gatsonis C.
    • Snyder B.
    • Singh H.
    • Miller C.D.
    • Entrikin D.W.
    • et al.
    CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes.
    N Engl J Med. 2012; 366: 1393-1403
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
74. • Chang H.J.
    • Lin F.Y.
    • Gebow D.
    • An H.Y.
    • Andreini D.
    • Bathina R.
    • et al.
    Selective referral using CCTA versus direct referral for individuals referred to invasive coronary angiography for suspected CAD: a randomized, controlled, open-label trial.
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 12: 1303-1312
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
75. • Lubbers M.
    • Dedic A.
    • Coenen A.
    • Galema T.
    • Akkerhuis J.
    • Bruning T.
    • et al.
    Calcium imaging and selective computed tomography angiography in comparison to functional testing for suspected coronary artery disease: the multicentre, randomized CRESCENT trial.
    Eur Heart J. 2016; 37: 1232-1243
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
76. • Hamilton-Craig C.
    • Fifoot A.
    • Hansen M.
    • Pincus M.
    • Chan J.
    • Walters D.L.
    • et al.
    Diagnostic performance and cost of CT angiography versus stress ECG—a randomized prospective study of suspected acute coronary syndrome chest pain in the emergency department (CT-COMPARE).
    Int J Cardiol. 2014; 177: 867-873
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
77. • Nasis A.
    • Meredith I.T.
    • Sud P.S.
    • Cameron J.D.
    • Troupis J.M.
    • Seneviratne S.K.
    Long-term outcome after CT angiography in patients with possible acute coronary syndrome.
    Radiology. 2014; 272: 674-682
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
78. • Liew G.Y.
    • Feneley M.
    • Worthley S.G.
    Noninvasive coronary artery imaging: current clinical applications: Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand guidelines.
    Heart Lung Circ. 2011; 20: 425-437
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
79. • Leong C.L.
    • Teoh T.W.
    • Bentley L.
    • O'Rourke E.
    • Allright A.
    • Werkmeister M.
    • et al.
    Resource implications following expansion of computed tomography coronary angiography: an Australian experience.
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2021;
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
80. • Dreisbach J.G.
    • Nicol E.D.
    • Roobottom C.A.
    • Padley S.
    • Roditi G.
    Challenges in delivering computed tomography coronary angiography as the first-line test for stable chest pain.
    Heart. 2018; 104: 921-927
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
81. • Kempton H.R.
    • Bemand T.
    • Bart N.K.
    • Suttie J.J.
    Using coronary artery calcium scoring as preventative health tool to reduce the high burden of cardiovascular disease in Indigenous Australians.
    Heart Lung Circ. 2020; 29: 835-839
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
82. • Jeffries A.
    • Costello B.
    • Corkill W.
    • Varghese S.
    • Tayeb H.
    • Gallagher C.
    • et al.
    Prognostic value of coronary artery calcium scoring and computed tomography coronary angiography in remote Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians.
    Int J Cardiol. 2021; 328: 241-246
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar