Heart, Lung and Circulation
Review| Volume 32, ISSUE 3, P307-314, March 2023

Opportunities and Challenges of Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography in the Investigation of Chest Pain in the Emergency Department—A Narrative Review

Published:January 06, 2023DOI:
      Chest pain is one of the most common presentations to emergency departments. However, only 5.1% will be diagnosed with an acute coronary syndrome, representing considerable time and expense in the diagnosis and investigation of the patients eventually found not to be suffering from an acute coronary syndrome. PubMed and Medline databases were searched with variations of the terms “chest pain”, “emergency department”, “computed tomography coronary angiography”. After review, 52 articles were included. Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) is a class I endorsement for investigating chest pain in major international societal guidelines. CTCA offers excellent sensitivity and negative predictive value in identifying patients with coronary disease, with prognostic data impacting patient management. If CTCA is to be applied to all comers, it is pertinent to discuss the advantages and potential pitfalls if use in the Australian system is to be increased.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Heart, Lung and Circulation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


      1. Emergency department care activity. Aust Inst Health Welf. n.d.
        • Cullen L.
        • Greenslade J.
        • Merollini K.
        • Graves N.
        • Hammett C.J.K.
        • Hawkins T.
        • et al.
        Cost and outcomes of assessing patients with chest pain in an Australian emergency department.
        Med J Aust. 2015; 202: 427-432
        • Long B.
        • Oliver J.
        • Streitz M.
        • Koyfman A.
        An end-user’s guide to the HEART score and pathway.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2017; 35: 1350-1355
        • Backus B.E.
        • Six A.J.
        • Kelder J.C.
        • Bosschaert M.A.R.
        • Mast E.G.
        • Mosterd A.
        • et al.
        A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients at the emergency department.
        Int J Cardiol. 2013; 168: 2153-2158
        • Stephens J.R.
        Things we do for no reason: hospitalization for the evaluation of patients with low-risk chest pain.
        J Hosp Med. 2018; 13
        • Chew D.P.
        • Scott I.A.
        • Cullen L.
        • French J.K.
        • Briffa T.G.
        • Tideman P.A.
        • et al.
        National Heart Foundation of Australia & Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand: Australian clinical guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes 2016.
        Heart Lung Circ. 2016; 25: 895-951
        • Knuuti J.
        • Wijns W.
        • Saraste A.
        • Capodanno D.
        • Barbato E.
        • Funck-Brentano C.
        • et al.
        2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes: the task force for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).
        Eur Heart J. 2020; 41: 407-477
        • Moss A.J.
        • Williams M.C.
        • Newby D.E.
        • Nicol E.D.
        The updated NICE guidelines: cardiac CT as the first-line test for coronary artery disease.
        Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep. 2017; 10 (15)
        • Gulati M.
        • Levy P.D.
        • Mukherjee D.
        • Amsterdam E.
        • Bhatt D.L.
        • Birtcher K.K.
        • et al.
        2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines.
        Circulation. 2021; 144: e368-e454
        • Australian Government Department of Health
        Taskforce-endorsed report—Cardiac Services Clinical Committee. Aust Gov Dep Health. 2021.
        • Tonino P.A.L.
        • Fearon W.F.
        • De Bruyne B.
        • Oldroyd K.G.
        • Leesar M.A.
        • Ver Lee P.N.
        • et al.
        Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study: fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 55: 2816-2821
        • Dai N.
        • Zhang X.
        • Zhang Y.
        • Hou L.
        • Li W.
        • Fan B.
        • et al.
        Enhanced diagnostic utility achieved by myocardial blood analysis: a meta-analysis of noninvasive cardiac imaging in the detection of functional coronary artery disease.
        Int J Cardiol. 2016; 221: 665-673
        • Danad I.
        • Szymonifka J.
        • Twisk J.W.R.
        • Norgaard B.L.
        • Zarins C.K.
        • Knaapen P.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic performance of cardiac imaging methods to diagnose ischaemia-causing coronary artery disease when directly compared with fractional flow reserve as a reference standard: a meta-analysis.
        Eur Heart J. 2017; 38: 991-998
        • Takx R.A.P.
        • Blomberg B.A.
        • El Aidi H.
        • Habets J.
        • de Jong P.A.
        • Nagel E.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis. 8. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 2015
        • Danad I.
        • Raijmakers P.G.
        • Driessen R.S.
        • Leipsic J.
        • Raju R.
        • Naoum C.
        • et al.
        Comparison of Coronary CT angiography, SPECT, PET, and hybrid imaging for diagnosis of ischemic heart disease determined by fractional flow reserve.
        JAMA Cardiol. 2017; 2: 1100-1107
        • Driessen R.S.
        • Danad I.
        • Stuijfzand W.J.
        • Raijmakers P.G.
        • Schumacher S.P.
        • van Diemen P.A.
        • et al.
        Comparison of coronary computed tomography angiography, fractional flow reserve, and perfusion imaging for ischemia diagnosis.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 73: 161-173
        • Budoff M.J.
        • Dowe D.
        • Jollis J.G.
        • Gitter M.
        • Sutherland J.
        • Halamert E.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52: 1724-1732
        • Meijboom W.B.
        • Meijs M.F.L.
        • Schuijf J.D.
        • Cramer M.J.
        • Mollet N.R.
        • van Mieghem C.A.G.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52: 2135-2144
        • Arbab-Zadeh A.
        • Miller J.M.
        • Rochitte C.E.
        • Dewey M.
        • Niinuma H.
        • Gottlieb I.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography according to pre-test probability of coronary artery disease and severity of coronary arterial calcification. The CORE-64 (coronary artery evaluation using 64-row multidetector computed tomography angiography) international multicenter study.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59: 379-387
        • Linde J.J.
        • Kelbæk H.
        • Hansen T.F.
        • Sigvardsen P.E.
        • Torp-Pedersen C.
        • Bech J.
        • et al.
        Coronary CT angiography in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 75: 453-463
        • Andreini D.
        • Pontone G.
        • Mushtaq S.
        • Conte E.
        • Guglielmo M.
        • Mancini M.E.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography performed in 100 consecutive patients with coronary stents using a whole-organ high-definition CT scanner.
        Int J Cardiol. 2019; 274: 382-387
        • Serruys P.W.
        • Hara H.
        • Garg S.
        • Kawashima H.
        • Nørgaard B.L.
        • Dweck M.R.
        • et al.
        Coronary computed tomographic angiography for complete assessment of coronary artery disease.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021; 78: 713-736
        • Mancini G.B.J.
        • Leipsic J.
        • Budoff M.J.
        • Hague C.J.
        • Min J.K.
        • Stevens S.R.
        • et al.
        CT angiography followed by invasive angiography in patients with moderate or severe ischemia—insights from the ISCHEMIA trial.
        JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021; 14: 1384-1393
        • Chow B.J.W.
        • Small G.
        • Yam Y.
        • Chen L.
        • Achenbach S.
        • Al-Mallah M.
        • et al.
        Incremental prognostic value of cardiac computed tomography in coronary artery disease using CONFIRM: COroNary computed tomography angiography evaluation for clinical outcomes: an InteRnational Multicenter registry.
        Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011; 4: 463-472
        • Chow B.J.W.
        • Yam Y.
        • Small G.
        • Wells G.A.
        • Crean A.M.
        • Ruddy T.D.
        • et al.
        Prognostic durability of coronary computed tomography angiography.
        Eur Heart J—Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;
        • Newby D.E.
        • Adamson P.D.
        • Berry C.
        • Boon N.A.
        • Dweck M.R.
        • et al.
        • SCOT-HEART Investigators
        Coronary CT angiography and 5-year risk of myocardial infarction.
        N Engl J Med. 2018; 379: 924-933
        • Hoffmann U.
        • Ferencik M.
        • Udelson J.E.
        • Picard M.H.
        • Truong Q.A.
        • Patel M.R.
        • et al.
        Prognostic value of noninvasive cardiovascular testing in patients with stable chest pain: insights from the PROMISE trial (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain).
        Circulation. 2017; 135: 2320-2332
        • Bittencourt M.S.
        • Hulten E.
        • Ghoshhajra B.
        • O’Leary D.
        • Christman M.P.
        • Montana P.
        • et al.
        Prognostic value of nonobstructive and obstructive coronary artery disease detected by coronary computed tomography angiography to identify cardiovascular events.
        Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014; 7: 282-291
        • SCOT-HEART investigators
        CT coronary angiography in patients with suspected angina due to coronary heart disease (SCOT-HEART): an open-label, parallel-group, multicentre trial.
        Lancet Lond Engl. 2015; 385: 2383-2391
        • Douglas P.S.
        • Hoffmann U.
        • Patel M.R.
        • Mark D.B.
        • Al-Khalidi H.R.
        • Cavanaugh B.
        • et al.
        Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease.
        N Engl J Med. 2015; 372: 1291-1300
        • Gray A.J.
        • Roobottom C.
        • Smith J.E.
        • Goodacre S.
        • Oatey K.
        • O’Brien R.
        • et al.
        Early computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: randomised controlled trial.
        BMJ. 2021; 374: n2106
        • Finck T.
        • Hardenberg J.
        • Will A.
        • Hendrich E.
        • Haller B.
        • Martinoff S.
        • et al.
        10-year follow-up after coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
        JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 12: 1330-1338
        • Ayoub C.
        • Erthal F.
        • Abdelsalam M.A.
        • Murad M.H.
        • Wang Z.
        • Erwin P.J.
        • et al.
        Prognostic value of segment involvement score compared to other measures of coronary atherosclerosis by computed tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017; 11: 258-267
        • Min J.K.
        • Dunning A.
        • Lin F.Y.
        • Achenbach S.
        • Al-Mallah M.
        • Budoff M.J.
        • et al.
        Age- and sex-related differences in all-cause mortality risk based on coronary computed tomography angiography findings: results from the international multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: an international multicenter registry) of 23,854 patients without known coronary artery disease.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58: 849-860
        • Hadamitzky M.
        • Täubert S.
        • Deseive S.
        • Martinoff S.
        • Schoemig A.
        • Hausleiter J.
        Prognostic value of coronary computed tomography angiography during 5 years of follow up in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59: E1323
        • Nørgaard B.L.
        • Gaur S.
        • Fairbairn T.A.
        • Douglas P.S.
        • Jensen J.M.
        • Patel M.R.
        • et al.
        Prognostic value of coronary computed tomography angiographic derived fractional flow reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Heart. 2021; (heartjnl-2021-319773)
        • Ihdayhid A.R.
        • Yong A.
        • Harper R.
        • Rankin J.
        • Wong C.
        • Brown A.J.
        • et al.
        A practical guide for fractional flow reserve guided revascularisation.
        Heart Lung Circ. 2018; 27: 406-419
        • Mickley H.
        • Veien K.T.
        • Gerke O.
        • Lambrechtsen J.
        • Rohold A.
        • Steffensen F.H.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic and clinical value of FFRCT in stable chest pain patients with extensive coronary calcification.
        JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022; S1936878X21009104
        • Khav N.
        • Ihdayhid A.R.
        • Ko B.
        CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) in the evaluation of coronary artery disease.
        Heart Lung Circ. 2020; 29: 1621-1632
        • Pontone G.
        • Weir-McCall J.R.
        • Baggiano A.
        • Del Torto A.
        • Fusini L.
        • Guglielmo M.
        • et al.
        Determinants of rejection rate for coronary CT angiography fractional flow reserve analysis.
        Radiology. 2019; 292: 597-605
        • Gonzalez J.A.
        • Lipinski M.J.
        • Flors L.
        • Shaw P.W.
        • Kramer C.M.
        • Salerno M.
        Meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography angiography, computed tomography perfusion, and computed tomography-fractional flow reserve in functional myocardial ischemia assessment versus invasive fractional flow reserve.
        Am J Cardiol. 2015; 116: 1469-1478
        • Hamilton-Craig C.
        • Fifoot A.
        • Hansen M.
        • Pincus M.
        • Chan J.
        • Walters D.L.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic performance and cost of CT angiography versus stress ECG—A randomized prospective study of suspected acute coronary syndrome chest pain in the emergency department (CT-COMPARE).
        Int J Cardiol. 2014; 177: 867-873
        • Leong C.L.
        • Teoh T.W.
        • Bentley L.
        • O’Rourke E.
        • Allright A.
        • Werkmeister M.
        • et al.
        Resource implications following expansion of computed tomography coronary angiography: an Australian experience.
        J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2021; (n/a)
        • Hirshfeld J.W.
        • Ferrari V.A.
        • Bengel F.M.
        • Bergersen L.
        • Chambers C.E.
        • Einstein A.J.
        • et al.
        2018 ACC/HRS/NASCI/SCAI/SCCT Expert consensus document on optimal use of ionizing radiation in cardiovascular imaging—best practices for safety and effectiveness, Part 1: radiation physics and radiation biology.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 71: 2811-2828
        • Hausleiter J.
        • Meyer T.
        • Hermann F.
        • Hadamitzky M.
        • Krebs M.
        • Gerber T.C.
        • et al.
        Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography.
        JAMA. 2009; 301: 500-507
        • Hausleiter J.
        • Martinoff S.
        • Hadamitzky M.
        • Martuscelli E.
        • Pschierer I.
        • Feuchtner G.M.
        • et al.
        Image quality and radiation exposure with a low tube voltage protocol for coronary CT angiography: results of the PROTECTION II Trial.
        JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010; 3: 1113-1123
        • Hausleiter J.
        • Meyer T.S.
        • Martuscelli E.
        • Spagnolo P.
        • Yamamoto H.
        • Carrascosa P.
        • et al.
        Image quality and radiation exposure with prospectively ECG-triggered axial scanning for coronary CT angiography: the multicenter, multivendor, randomized PROTECTION-III study.
        JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012; 5: 484-493
        • Deseive S.
        • Pugliese F.
        • Meave A.
        • Alexanderson E.
        • Martinoff S.
        • Hadamitzky M.
        • et al.
        Image quality and radiation dose of a prospectively electrocardiography-triggered high-pitch data acquisition strategy for coronary CT angiography: the multicenter, randomized PROTECTION IV study.
        J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015; 9: 278-285
        • Deseive S.
        • Chen M.Y.
        • Korosoglou G.
        • Leipsic J.
        • Martuscelli E.
        • Carrascosa P.
        • et al.
        Prospective randomized trial on radiation dose estimates of CT angiography applying iterative image reconstruction: the PROTECTION V study.
        JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 8: 888-896
        • Stocker T.J.
        • Deseive S.
        • Leipsic J.
        • Hadamitzky M.
        • Chen M.Y.
        • Rubinshtein R.
        • et al.
        Reduction in radiation exposure in cardiovascular computed tomography imaging: results from the PROspective multicenter registry on radiaTion dose Estimates of cardiac CT angIOgraphy iN daily practice in 2017 (PROTECTION VI).
        Eur Heart J. 2018; 39: 3715-3723
        • Huse O.
        • Hettiarachchi J.
        • Gearon E.
        • Nichols M.
        • Allender S.
        • Peeters A.
        Obesity in Australia.
        Obes Res Clin Pract. 2018; 12: 29-39
        • Hoffmann U.
        • Truong Q.A.
        • Schoenfeld D.A.
        • Chou E.T.
        • Woodard P.K.
        • Nagurney J.T.
        • et al.
        Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain.
        N Engl J Med. 2012; 367: 299-308
        • Hamilton-Craig C.R.
        • Tandon K.
        • Kwan B.
        • DeBoni K.
        • Burley C.
        • Wesley A.J.
        • et al.
        Coronary CT radiation dose reduction strategies at an Australian tertiary care center—improvements in radiation exposure through an evidence-based approach.
        J Med Radiat Sci. 2020; 67: 25-33
      2. ARPANSA n.d. Current Australian national diagnostic reference levels for multi detector computed tomography (accessed January 3, 2023).